Improper posterior — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A prior on the spread
Integrating over the population spread means putting a prior on it, which sounds like the objection rather than the repair. The prior's effect is measurable, it is invisible where the groups are clearly different, and the reflex choice for a scale parameter turns out not to have a posterior at all.
A control borrowed from the last trial
A trial of fifty patients an arm can borrow its control group from an earlier trial of two hundred by treating the two control means as draws from one population with a spread between trials. With two trials there is one difference to learn that spread from, so the prior on it decides how much is borrowed — and its tail decides whether the borrowing stops when the two trials disagree. A half-normal prior of scale 0.05 buys 17.4 points of power and, at a drift of 1.5 standard deviations, still declares a treatment with no effect a success 31.8% of the time. A half-Cauchy of the same scale buys 13.6 points, peaks at 11.0% and falls back to 3.4%.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
The half-Cauchy priorHierarchical modelPriorPrior sensitivityEmpirical BayesError rateFlat priorMarginal likelihoodPartial poolingPosteriorPosterior meanStatistical power