Decision theory — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Choosing whether to break
Charging what the search manufactures takes a rule from splitting a stationary sample on 99% of draws to 16%. It also costs regret, because the two mistakes a rule can make are not the same size.
The level a limit should be set at
When a failure costs twenty times a standard deviation of margin, a t limit on fifteen exponential observations set at the conventional 97.5% has an expected loss of 2.143. Set at 99.95%, the same formula's loss is 1.263 — within 1% of the best any fixed multiple of s/√n can do, and ahead of both Hall's transformation and the fitted gamma family at their own best levels. Hall's is the worst at every level on every source. Choosing the level does more than choosing the construction, and the correction that reads the sample is the one no level rescues.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Change pointCoverageError rateExpected lossIdentificationInformation criterionLoss differentialModel selectionOptimismRegretRisk setSample size