Orthogonal complement — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as separation — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
How far to project
The field's repair for a probe is to project it off the span the balancing rule already pinned. Treated as a dial rather than a switch, that repair is right all the way for the fourth power — its separation rises from 1.543 unprojected to 5.080 fully projected — and wrong for the design's own leverage, which carries 4.537 unprojected, 4.924 at four tenths of the way and only 3.836 projected fully. The leverage probe the field recommended was a third of the way past its best. Even the separating direction itself gains a little from a partial projection and loses a little from a full one.
A ceiling that is one unit
The benchmark every probe of a split admissible set was measured against maximised the wrong thing, so the obvious next step was the direction that maximises the separation itself. On 88 of 100 split designs that direction has no finite value: some combination of units reads the same on every assignment of a component. On 83 of them it is a single unit, sitting in one arm across one component and the other arm across the other — and a chain can see a unit that never moves without enumerating anything.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Admissible setCovariate balanceEnumerationLeverageMarkov chainProjectionRandomisation testSeparationBasis functionsFalse-alarm