Odds form — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
What a positive test is worth
A test that is 90% sensitive and 95% specific sounds accurate. For a condition affecting one person in a thousand, 98% of its positive results are wrong, and a worse test on a commoner condition beats a better test on a rare one.
The base rate was always Bayes
The screening arithmetic everybody finds counter-intuitive is a posterior update with a prior of one in a thousand. Naming it that way turns a famous puzzle into an instance of a rule, and makes the sequential version obvious.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Base ratePredictive valuePriorScreeningBase rate fallacyThe Bayes factorFalse positivep-valuePositive predictive valuePosteriorSensitivity and specificitySequential testing