Fieller interval — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as ratio estimator — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
The optimum is a ratio, and its interval is sometimes the whole line
The best setting is −b₁/2b₂: a ratio of two estimates whose denominator is a curvature the design can often barely see. The delta method reports a finite interval every time and covers 68.8% where the curvature is weak; Fieller's set covers 95% and says so by being unbounded.
A ratio whose interval has to be the whole line
The delta interval for a ratio of two means covers 95.61% when the denominator is eight standard errors from zero and 1.10% at a ten-thousandth of one, and ten times as wide it still covers only 3.48%. Linearising is not the fault. Gleser and Hwang proved that every interval that is always finite fails the same way, so an interval that keeps its promise has to be the whole line some of the time.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Confidence intervalCoverageDelta methodRatio estimatorBootstrapCentral composite designConditional coverageCurvatureGleser–Hwang theoremMonte CarloNon-central χ²Percentile interval