Non-central χ² — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Where the derivative is zero
The delta method reads a standard error off a tangent line, and at a flat point the tangent says the spread is zero. The interval built on it for a squared mean covers 99.991% there and 85.978% one and a half standard errors away, with nearly every miss on the same side — and the law it should have used is a χ², not a normal.
A ratio whose interval has to be the whole line
The delta interval for a ratio of two means covers 95.61% when the denominator is eight standard errors from zero and 1.10% at a ten-thousandth of one, and ten times as wide it still covers only 3.48%. Linearising is not the fault. Gleser and Hwang proved that every interval that is always finite fails the same way, so an interval that keeps its promise has to be the whole line some of the time.
A flat point with more than one direction
At a stationary point of a function of several means the second-order law is ½ Z′HZ, so the bias is half the Hessian's trace — 2.008 for a bowl, 5.028 for a valley, and −0.006 for a saddle, where the eigenvalues cancel. The saddle's coverage is the worst of the three.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Confidence intervalCoverageDelta methodCentral limit theoremChi-squareClosed formSecond-order delta methodSkewnessStationary pointAsymptotic biasBinomial proportionBootstrap