Alpha spending — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Spending the error rate
The repair for interim testing is to spend 5% across the looks rather than at each one. The boundaries are solvable rather than quotable, and a trial that can stop early uses 298 observations where a fixed design uses 400 — at a cost of half a point of power.
A look the trend asked for
Under an O'Brien–Fleming-type spending function, every schedule of looks fixed in advance spends exactly 5.0000%. A committee that adds a look at three quarters of the trial whenever the interim z is 1.5 or more spends 5.2323% — 5.315% counted over a hundred thousand trials — and the most a committee choosing among six schedules could spend is 5.4390%.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Error rateGroup-sequential designO'Brien–FlemingThe Pocock boundaryClosed formInterim analysisMonte CarloOptional stoppingp-valueStagewise orderingStatistical powerStopping rule