Visual inference — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The band the eye was standing in for
The confidence band software draws on a quantile plot holds each point at 95%, and a genuinely normal sample of forty has forty chances to leave it — so 45.0% of them do. The band a reader is actually using is that one widened by a factor of 1.502, and nothing draws it.
What normal actually looks like
A single quantile plot of forty normal points wanders enough to look suspicious. Twenty of them, all genuinely normal, show what the noise looks like — and any single panel a reader would have rejected is in there.
Twenty residual plots
Judging whether a residual plot looks wrong requires knowing what a correct one looks like, and almost nobody has seen twenty of those. Here they are, from a model that is exactly right, at the sample size that matters.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
NormalityQ–Q plotResidual plotSample sizeSampling variationConfidence bandError rateThe line-up testModel diagnosticsMultiple comparisonsOrder statisticp-value