The line-up test — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Twenty residual plots
Judging whether a residual plot looks wrong requires knowing what a correct one looks like, and almost nobody has seen twenty of those. Here they are, from a model that is exactly right, at the sample size that matters.
A number for the shape
Five one-number summaries of a quantile plot's departure from its line, each a correct 5% test on forty normal observations, and no two agree about what matters. Straightness catches a skewed source 83% of the time and light tails 31%; kurtosis catches light tails 72% and skewness 0.2%. Reading all five and reporting whichever looks bad rejects 13.9% of genuinely normal samples. Correcting that search to 5% costs almost half the power against the departure it would have caught best — and a line-up of twenty panels gets the same correction for nothing.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Visual inferenceError rateKurtosisModel diagnosticsMultiple comparisonsNormalityQ–Q plotResidual plotSample sizeSkewnessStatistical power