Ridge analysis — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
When the best setting is outside the region
On a flat surface at twice the noise the fitted optimum lands outside the experimental region on 24.9% of studies and more than three coded units out on 11.8%. The answer is a ridge — the best setting at each radius, with a closed form — and the two obvious rules for using it turn out to be within four per cent of each other.
The run that confirms it
The setting a response-surface analysis recommends was chosen because the fitted surface was highest there, so the height the fit predicts at it is a maximum over a random field. At twice the noise the fit predicts 0.858 more than is there — 0.72 of the prediction's own standard error — and the gap is not noise, it is the selection.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Experimental designPrediction varianceResponse-surfaceStationary pointCanonical analysisCentral composite designConstrained optimisationCurvatureEigenvalueForecast intervalMonte CarloSaddle point