Correlogram — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
What differencing costs
Differencing takes the false-positive rate between two unrelated walks from 76.7% to 4.9%, and takes a genuine relationship's R² from 0.91 to 0.33. Applied to a series that did not need it, it doubles the variance and installs a correlation of −0.5 that the data never had.
The check before the standard error
One number decides whether every interval in an analysis is trustworthy, and the check for it flags a lag-one correlation of 0.5 nine times in ten — and one of 0.2 only one time in five, where the interval already covers 88.6% instead of 95%.
The residuals are not the errors
A fit removes the part of the errors lying in its own column space, and a persistent design's column space is itself slow — so what is left behind is smoother than what went in, at every lag, by an amount that grows with the lag.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
AutocorrelationDependenceCorrelationDifferencingSample sizeBias correctionBlock bootstrapCointegrationCoverageDurbin–WatsonFalse positiveHat matrix