Conditional independence — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The second test that is not a second opinion
Two positives from a 90/95 test on a one-in-a-thousand condition give a 24.49% chance of disease if the tests are independent. At a correlation of 0.1 between their errors it is 10.16%, and at 0.5 it is 3.16% — barely more than the 1.77% one positive was worth.
The two worlds that look the same
Three causal structures were fitted to one covariance matrix and agree with it to 4.4·10⁻¹⁶. The regression returns 0.5000 under all three; the effect they hold is 0.5000, 0.8481 and 0.8481. What separates structures is a missing edge, and the signature of one is a correlation of exactly zero.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Base rateCausal diagramCausal effectCovariance matrixFisher transformIdentificationLikelihood ratioMarkov equivalenceNull hypothesisObservational equivalencePartial correlationPosterior