Simultaneous inference — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The band the eye was standing in for
The confidence band software draws on a quantile plot holds each point at 95%, and a genuinely normal sample of forty has forty chances to leave it — so 45.0% of them do. The band a reader is actually using is that one widened by a factor of 1.502, and nothing draws it.
All of the next ten
A warranty, a batch release or a monitoring rule promises something about every one of the next ten observations, not about one. From a sample of ten, the band that holds all ten with 95% probability reaches 3.716 sample standard deviations either side of the mean — already wider than the 3.382 of a tolerance interval for 95% of the population — and it keeps widening: 4.942 for a hundred, 6.008 for a thousand, with no ceiling. A 95% prediction interval, read as the answer, holds all ten 67.9% of the time: more than 0.95 to the tenth power, because the ten succeed and fail together.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BonferroniConfidence bandEstimated varianceExtreme valueMultiple comparisonsNormal distributionNormalityOrder statisticPrediction intervalQ–Q plotSample sizeSampling variation