Pure-error — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The design that cannot see a curve
A two-level factorial has every run at a corner, where every squared term equals one — so the column that would estimate curvature is a copy of the intercept, and the design has no information about it at all. A few runs at the centre buy one number back, and only one.
Three runs at the end of the line
With one run at the top of a regression's range, a bad observation there and a line that bends there produce data with exactly the same distribution, so no residual, influence measure or test can say which happened. Move six of twelve runs to the ends, three at each, and a discrepancy of four σ is named correctly as a bad run 84.1% of the time and as a bend 91.6% — while the slope's standard error falls from 0.0836 to 0.0709. The design, not the diagnostic, decides whether the question has an answer.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Experimental designCentre pointCurvatureDegrees of freedomFactorial designInfluenceLack of fitLeverageModel diagnosticsThe non-central tOutlierResidual plot