Masking — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two points that hide each other
One far observation among twenty-one has a Cook's distance of 24.1. Put a second beside it and the two read 0.966 and 0.772, neither crossing 1, while together they reverse the slope and deleting both moves the fit by 53.3.
A robust loss and a far x
One far row drags least squares to a slope of −0.389. Huber's loss, the standard robust line, reaches only 0.171, and carried further out the same row gets its full weight back. Least trimmed squares reads 0.420 at every distance, and at the normal model keeps 7.13% of least squares' efficiency to do it.
The start an efficient robust line inherits
The MM-estimator carries a trimmed fit on through a redescending loss, and it does what it promises on one far row: slope 0.479 at every distance, the row at weight exactly zero, and 87.2% of least squares' efficiency at twenty rows. What it cannot do is choose. At eight far rows of twenty the exact trimmed fit picks the wrong half on 111 datasets; the efficient step repairs none of them, spoils none of the other 89, and ends nearer the wrong line than the start did.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Closed formLeverageOutliersBreakdown pointEfficiencyIteratively reweighted least squaresLeast trimmed squaresLocal minimumM estimatorRobust regressionBonferroniCook's distance