Box behnken design — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The design that refuses the corners
Box–Behnken runs three factors in fifteen runs and puts none of them at a corner, which is what makes it usable where a corner cannot be run. It predicts the corner 1.84 times worse than the seventeen-run design that goes there, and 1.31 times worse at the middle of a face, and all three numbers are matrix computations with no simulation in them.
The run that did not happen
Lose one run from any orthogonal design and every coefficient's variance is multiplied by exactly 1 + 1/(N − p), and every pair of coefficients acquires a correlation of exactly 1/(N − p + 1) where there was none. The price is set by the design's spare capacity and by nothing else, and a saturated design cannot survive it at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Central composite designExperimental designFactorial designStudy designCentre pointCorrelationCurvatureDegrees of freedomFractional factorialLeast squaresOrthogonalityPrediction variance